Review



ventricular system volume and csf pressure  (SAS institute)


Bioz Verified Symbol SAS institute is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    SAS institute ventricular system volume and csf pressure
    a The values of the maximum aqueductal <t>CSF</t> stroke volume for healthy subjects and patients under BCs “A”, “B”, and “C”. It should be noted that there were 8 healthy subjects and 11 hydrocephalus patients in this study. b compares the CSF pressure diagrams in <t>the</t> <t>SAS</t> and CA of patient No. 7 under BCs “A”, “B”, and “C”. c – e display three snapshots of CSF pressure distribution under BC “B” in the patient No. 7 at 17.5% (mid-systole), 64% (diastole), and 84% (early systole) of the cardiac cycle, respectively. The units of the color scale are Pascal. Panels ( f ) and ( g ), respectively, show the CSF velocity diagram calculated with FSI simulation and the in vivo-measured diagram based on the cardiac cycle under BC “C” in the CA of patient No. 7. Raw data for Fig. 1a are included in Supplementary Data . CV coefficient of variation, SE standard error, BC boundary condition, CSF cerebrospinal fluid, CA cerebral aqueduct.
    Ventricular System Volume And Csf Pressure, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/ventricular+system+volume+and+csf+pressure/ventricular+system+volume+and+csf+pressure/pmc07988041-215-8-11
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ventricular system volume and csf pressure - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Boundary conditions investigation to improve computer simulation of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in hydrocephalus patients"

    Article Title: Boundary conditions investigation to improve computer simulation of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in hydrocephalus patients

    Journal: Communications Biology

    doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-01920-w

    a The values of the maximum aqueductal CSF stroke volume for healthy subjects and patients under BCs “A”, “B”, and “C”. It should be noted that there were 8 healthy subjects and 11 hydrocephalus patients in this study. b compares the CSF pressure diagrams in the SAS and CA of patient No. 7 under BCs “A”, “B”, and “C”. c – e display three snapshots of CSF pressure distribution under BC “B” in the patient No. 7 at 17.5% (mid-systole), 64% (diastole), and 84% (early systole) of the cardiac cycle, respectively. The units of the color scale are Pascal. Panels ( f ) and ( g ), respectively, show the CSF velocity diagram calculated with FSI simulation and the in vivo-measured diagram based on the cardiac cycle under BC “C” in the CA of patient No. 7. Raw data for Fig. 1a are included in Supplementary Data . CV coefficient of variation, SE standard error, BC boundary condition, CSF cerebrospinal fluid, CA cerebral aqueduct.
    Figure Legend Snippet: a The values of the maximum aqueductal CSF stroke volume for healthy subjects and patients under BCs “A”, “B”, and “C”. It should be noted that there were 8 healthy subjects and 11 hydrocephalus patients in this study. b compares the CSF pressure diagrams in the SAS and CA of patient No. 7 under BCs “A”, “B”, and “C”. c – e display three snapshots of CSF pressure distribution under BC “B” in the patient No. 7 at 17.5% (mid-systole), 64% (diastole), and 84% (early systole) of the cardiac cycle, respectively. The units of the color scale are Pascal. Panels ( f ) and ( g ), respectively, show the CSF velocity diagram calculated with FSI simulation and the in vivo-measured diagram based on the cardiac cycle under BC “C” in the CA of patient No. 7. Raw data for Fig. 1a are included in Supplementary Data . CV coefficient of variation, SE standard error, BC boundary condition, CSF cerebrospinal fluid, CA cerebral aqueduct.

    Techniques Used: In Vivo

    The maximum CSF pressure details and volumes of head substructures of the eight healthy subjects.
    Figure Legend Snippet: The maximum CSF pressure details and volumes of head substructures of the eight healthy subjects.

    Techniques Used: Standard Deviation

    The maximum CSF pressure details and volumes of head substructures of the 11 patients.
    Figure Legend Snippet: The maximum CSF pressure details and volumes of head substructures of the 11 patients.

    Techniques Used: Standard Deviation

    a – c The comparison between the FSI simulation data and CINE PC-MRI data of the maximum CSF velocity in the CA of all healthy subjects and patients under BCs “A”, “B”, and “C”, respectively. d – f The PCC values between the maximum CSF pressure in SAS and the ventricular system volume of patients under BCs “A”, “B”, and “C”, respectively. g The comparison between the FSI and CFD data of the maximum CSF pressure in SAS of all the patients under BC “C”. It should be noted that there were 8 healthy subjects and 11 hydrocephalus patients in this study. Raw data for a – c are included in Supplementary Data file . Raw data for d – g are included in Tables and . SE standard error, SD standard deviation, BC boundary condition, CSF cerebrospinal fluid, CA cerebral aqueduct, SAS subarachnoid space, CFD computational fluid dynamics, FSI fluid–structure interaction, PCC Pearson correlation coefficient.
    Figure Legend Snippet: a – c The comparison between the FSI simulation data and CINE PC-MRI data of the maximum CSF velocity in the CA of all healthy subjects and patients under BCs “A”, “B”, and “C”, respectively. d – f The PCC values between the maximum CSF pressure in SAS and the ventricular system volume of patients under BCs “A”, “B”, and “C”, respectively. g The comparison between the FSI and CFD data of the maximum CSF pressure in SAS of all the patients under BC “C”. It should be noted that there were 8 healthy subjects and 11 hydrocephalus patients in this study. Raw data for a – c are included in Supplementary Data file . Raw data for d – g are included in Tables and . SE standard error, SD standard deviation, BC boundary condition, CSF cerebrospinal fluid, CA cerebral aqueduct, SAS subarachnoid space, CFD computational fluid dynamics, FSI fluid–structure interaction, PCC Pearson correlation coefficient.

    Techniques Used: Comparison, Standard Deviation

    a shows the locations of the head substructures. b , c show the head MRI images for patient No. 7. d shows the 3D geometrical model of SAS for patient No. 7. e shows mesh modeling of the ventricular system. f shows the inlet and outlet flow-rate diagrams in BC “C”. g , h show mesh convergence study for the maximum CSF pressure in SAS and the maximum CSF velocity in CA under the BC “B” of the patient No. 7, respectively. BC boundary condition, CSF cerebrospinal fluid, CA cerebral aqueduct, SAS subarachnoid space.
    Figure Legend Snippet: a shows the locations of the head substructures. b , c show the head MRI images for patient No. 7. d shows the 3D geometrical model of SAS for patient No. 7. e shows mesh modeling of the ventricular system. f shows the inlet and outlet flow-rate diagrams in BC “C”. g , h show mesh convergence study for the maximum CSF pressure in SAS and the maximum CSF velocity in CA under the BC “B” of the patient No. 7, respectively. BC boundary condition, CSF cerebrospinal fluid, CA cerebral aqueduct, SAS subarachnoid space.

    Techniques Used:

    The maximum CSF velocities and pressures of all patients in three computational grids, and number of fine-mesh under BC “C”.
    Figure Legend Snippet: The maximum CSF velocities and pressures of all patients in three computational grids, and number of fine-mesh under BC “C”.

    Techniques Used:

    Related Articles

    Clinical Proteomics:

    Article Title: Boundary conditions investigation to improve computer simulation of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in hydrocephalus patients
    Article Snippet: .. As mentioned before, the ventricular system volume and CSF pressure in SAS can reveal ICC, a valuable index for analyzing hydrocephalus patients’ conditions during the treatment process. ..

    Immunocytochemistry:

    Article Title: Boundary conditions investigation to improve computer simulation of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in hydrocephalus patients
    Article Snippet: .. As mentioned before, the ventricular system volume and CSF pressure in SAS can reveal ICC, a valuable index for analyzing hydrocephalus patients’ conditions during the treatment process. ..



    Similar Products

    ventricular system volume and csf pressure  (SAS institute)
    90
    SAS institute ventricular system volume and csf pressure
    a The values of the maximum aqueductal <t>CSF</t> stroke volume for healthy subjects and patients under BCs “A”, “B”, and “C”. It should be noted that there were 8 healthy subjects and 11 hydrocephalus patients in this study. b compares the CSF pressure diagrams in <t>the</t> <t>SAS</t> and CA of patient No. 7 under BCs “A”, “B”, and “C”. c – e display three snapshots of CSF pressure distribution under BC “B” in the patient No. 7 at 17.5% (mid-systole), 64% (diastole), and 84% (early systole) of the cardiac cycle, respectively. The units of the color scale are Pascal. Panels ( f ) and ( g ), respectively, show the CSF velocity diagram calculated with FSI simulation and the in vivo-measured diagram based on the cardiac cycle under BC “C” in the CA of patient No. 7. Raw data for Fig. 1a are included in Supplementary Data . CV coefficient of variation, SE standard error, BC boundary condition, CSF cerebrospinal fluid, CA cerebral aqueduct.
    Ventricular System Volume And Csf Pressure, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/ventricular+system+volume+and+csf+pressure/ventricular+system+volume+and+csf+pressure/pmc07988041-215-8-11
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ventricular system volume and csf pressure - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    a The values of the maximum aqueductal CSF stroke volume for healthy subjects and patients under BCs “A”, “B”, and “C”. It should be noted that there were 8 healthy subjects and 11 hydrocephalus patients in this study. b compares the CSF pressure diagrams in the SAS and CA of patient No. 7 under BCs “A”, “B”, and “C”. c – e display three snapshots of CSF pressure distribution under BC “B” in the patient No. 7 at 17.5% (mid-systole), 64% (diastole), and 84% (early systole) of the cardiac cycle, respectively. The units of the color scale are Pascal. Panels ( f ) and ( g ), respectively, show the CSF velocity diagram calculated with FSI simulation and the in vivo-measured diagram based on the cardiac cycle under BC “C” in the CA of patient No. 7. Raw data for Fig. 1a are included in Supplementary Data . CV coefficient of variation, SE standard error, BC boundary condition, CSF cerebrospinal fluid, CA cerebral aqueduct.

    Journal: Communications Biology

    Article Title: Boundary conditions investigation to improve computer simulation of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in hydrocephalus patients

    doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-01920-w

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a The values of the maximum aqueductal CSF stroke volume for healthy subjects and patients under BCs “A”, “B”, and “C”. It should be noted that there were 8 healthy subjects and 11 hydrocephalus patients in this study. b compares the CSF pressure diagrams in the SAS and CA of patient No. 7 under BCs “A”, “B”, and “C”. c – e display three snapshots of CSF pressure distribution under BC “B” in the patient No. 7 at 17.5% (mid-systole), 64% (diastole), and 84% (early systole) of the cardiac cycle, respectively. The units of the color scale are Pascal. Panels ( f ) and ( g ), respectively, show the CSF velocity diagram calculated with FSI simulation and the in vivo-measured diagram based on the cardiac cycle under BC “C” in the CA of patient No. 7. Raw data for Fig. 1a are included in Supplementary Data . CV coefficient of variation, SE standard error, BC boundary condition, CSF cerebrospinal fluid, CA cerebral aqueduct.

    Article Snippet: As mentioned before, the ventricular system volume and CSF pressure in SAS can reveal ICC, a valuable index for analyzing hydrocephalus patients’ conditions during the treatment process.

    Techniques: In Vivo

    The maximum CSF pressure details and volumes of head substructures of the eight healthy subjects.

    Journal: Communications Biology

    Article Title: Boundary conditions investigation to improve computer simulation of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in hydrocephalus patients

    doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-01920-w

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The maximum CSF pressure details and volumes of head substructures of the eight healthy subjects.

    Article Snippet: As mentioned before, the ventricular system volume and CSF pressure in SAS can reveal ICC, a valuable index for analyzing hydrocephalus patients’ conditions during the treatment process.

    Techniques: Standard Deviation

    The maximum CSF pressure details and volumes of head substructures of the 11 patients.

    Journal: Communications Biology

    Article Title: Boundary conditions investigation to improve computer simulation of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in hydrocephalus patients

    doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-01920-w

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The maximum CSF pressure details and volumes of head substructures of the 11 patients.

    Article Snippet: As mentioned before, the ventricular system volume and CSF pressure in SAS can reveal ICC, a valuable index for analyzing hydrocephalus patients’ conditions during the treatment process.

    Techniques: Standard Deviation

    a – c The comparison between the FSI simulation data and CINE PC-MRI data of the maximum CSF velocity in the CA of all healthy subjects and patients under BCs “A”, “B”, and “C”, respectively. d – f The PCC values between the maximum CSF pressure in SAS and the ventricular system volume of patients under BCs “A”, “B”, and “C”, respectively. g The comparison between the FSI and CFD data of the maximum CSF pressure in SAS of all the patients under BC “C”. It should be noted that there were 8 healthy subjects and 11 hydrocephalus patients in this study. Raw data for a – c are included in Supplementary Data file . Raw data for d – g are included in Tables and . SE standard error, SD standard deviation, BC boundary condition, CSF cerebrospinal fluid, CA cerebral aqueduct, SAS subarachnoid space, CFD computational fluid dynamics, FSI fluid–structure interaction, PCC Pearson correlation coefficient.

    Journal: Communications Biology

    Article Title: Boundary conditions investigation to improve computer simulation of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in hydrocephalus patients

    doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-01920-w

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a – c The comparison between the FSI simulation data and CINE PC-MRI data of the maximum CSF velocity in the CA of all healthy subjects and patients under BCs “A”, “B”, and “C”, respectively. d – f The PCC values between the maximum CSF pressure in SAS and the ventricular system volume of patients under BCs “A”, “B”, and “C”, respectively. g The comparison between the FSI and CFD data of the maximum CSF pressure in SAS of all the patients under BC “C”. It should be noted that there were 8 healthy subjects and 11 hydrocephalus patients in this study. Raw data for a – c are included in Supplementary Data file . Raw data for d – g are included in Tables and . SE standard error, SD standard deviation, BC boundary condition, CSF cerebrospinal fluid, CA cerebral aqueduct, SAS subarachnoid space, CFD computational fluid dynamics, FSI fluid–structure interaction, PCC Pearson correlation coefficient.

    Article Snippet: As mentioned before, the ventricular system volume and CSF pressure in SAS can reveal ICC, a valuable index for analyzing hydrocephalus patients’ conditions during the treatment process.

    Techniques: Comparison, Standard Deviation

    a shows the locations of the head substructures. b , c show the head MRI images for patient No. 7. d shows the 3D geometrical model of SAS for patient No. 7. e shows mesh modeling of the ventricular system. f shows the inlet and outlet flow-rate diagrams in BC “C”. g , h show mesh convergence study for the maximum CSF pressure in SAS and the maximum CSF velocity in CA under the BC “B” of the patient No. 7, respectively. BC boundary condition, CSF cerebrospinal fluid, CA cerebral aqueduct, SAS subarachnoid space.

    Journal: Communications Biology

    Article Title: Boundary conditions investigation to improve computer simulation of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in hydrocephalus patients

    doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-01920-w

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a shows the locations of the head substructures. b , c show the head MRI images for patient No. 7. d shows the 3D geometrical model of SAS for patient No. 7. e shows mesh modeling of the ventricular system. f shows the inlet and outlet flow-rate diagrams in BC “C”. g , h show mesh convergence study for the maximum CSF pressure in SAS and the maximum CSF velocity in CA under the BC “B” of the patient No. 7, respectively. BC boundary condition, CSF cerebrospinal fluid, CA cerebral aqueduct, SAS subarachnoid space.

    Article Snippet: As mentioned before, the ventricular system volume and CSF pressure in SAS can reveal ICC, a valuable index for analyzing hydrocephalus patients’ conditions during the treatment process.

    Techniques:

    The maximum CSF velocities and pressures of all patients in three computational grids, and number of fine-mesh under BC “C”.

    Journal: Communications Biology

    Article Title: Boundary conditions investigation to improve computer simulation of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in hydrocephalus patients

    doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-01920-w

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The maximum CSF velocities and pressures of all patients in three computational grids, and number of fine-mesh under BC “C”.

    Article Snippet: As mentioned before, the ventricular system volume and CSF pressure in SAS can reveal ICC, a valuable index for analyzing hydrocephalus patients’ conditions during the treatment process.

    Techniques: